Skip to content

Conversation

@e06084
Copy link
Collaborator

@e06084 e06084 commented Jan 12, 2026

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @e06084, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly enhances the multimodal evaluation capabilities by introducing VLMRenderJudge, a metric designed for visually assessing OCR quality. Unlike traditional text-based comparisons, this metric renders OCR results into images and leverages VLMs to judge their consistency against original images. This approach is particularly beneficial for evaluating complex content like mathematical formulas and structured tables, offering a more human-like assessment of OCR accuracy. The accompanying RenderTool provides the necessary functionality to convert various content types into visual representations for this evaluation.

Highlights

  • New VLMRenderJudge Metric: Introduced a novel visual OCR quality evaluation metric that uses a Vision-Language Model (VLM) to compare rendered OCR output with original images.
  • RenderTool for Content Visualization: Added a RenderTool capable of converting text, LaTeX equations, and HTML tables into images, which is crucial for the VLMRenderJudge workflow.
  • Comprehensive Documentation: Provided detailed English and Chinese guides for VLMRenderJudge, covering its principles, usage, and integration.
  • Expanded Test Coverage: Included new test data and unit tests for both VLMRenderJudge and RenderTool to ensure reliability and correctness.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new VLMRenderJudge metric for visually evaluating OCR quality. This is a significant feature that uses a "Render -> Judge" pattern, where OCR output is rendered as an image and compared to the original using a VLM. The implementation includes a new RenderTool for handling text and LaTeX rendering, comprehensive documentation in both English and Chinese, and thorough unit tests. The code is well-structured, but there are a few areas for improvement, particularly in the RenderTool regarding security best practices, portability of LaTeX rendering, and robustness in handling special characters. The documentation also has a minor error in the installation command.

Comment on lines +369 to +406
# Escape special characters in text mode
# (simplified - full implementation would be more complex)
return content
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The _preprocess_latex method currently doesn't escape special LaTeX characters (e.g., _, ^, &, %, $, #, {, }). If the input content is not already a valid LaTeX string and contains these characters, it can cause the xelatex compilation to fail. While the comment acknowledges this is a simplified implementation, it's a potential source of bugs for real-world OCR data. Consider adding basic escaping for common special characters.


```bash
# Basic dependencies
pip install dingo pillow
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The installation command pip install dingo pillow is incorrect. The package name on PyPI is dingo-python. This will cause installation to fail for users following the guide.

Suggested change
pip install dingo pillow
pip install dingo-python pillow


```bash
# 基础依赖
pip install dingo pillow
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The installation command pip install dingo pillow is incorrect. The package name on PyPI is dingo-python. This will cause installation to fail for users following the guide.

Suggested change
pip install dingo pillow
pip install dingo-python pillow

@e06084 e06084 merged commit a63df8e into MigoXLab:dev Jan 13, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants